Five primitives. One sovereign runtime.

The problem.

A shared kernel is a soft boundary. A soft boundary is a boundary you argue for in an audit.

The principle.

One workload. One machine.

Every workload runs inside its own Firecracker microVM. Real kernel, real memory, real vCPUs, enforced by KVM. No shared kernel between tenants. No noisy neighbour, because there is no neighbour.

Boot is under 125ms. Container speed, virtual-machine isolation. You deploy the same OCI image you would to any modern runtime. The shape of the machine underneath is the difference.

The problem.

Network policies are written once, then drift. Every drift is an audit finding waiting to happen.

The principle.

No implicit trust. No configuration to forget.

Every service talks through a private IPv6 mesh built on WireGuard, enforced by eBPF in the kernel. Every packet encrypted. East-west isolation is a property of the runtime, not a policy a customer remembers to apply.

The problem.

Residency policies are marketing claims until the route can prove them.

The principle.

Bound to a jurisdiction by route, not by tag.

Storage sits on physical infrastructure inside a named jurisdiction. Data cannot drift to another region because the network path does not exist. Tenant keys. Immutable provenance. Right-to-be-forgotten as a primitive, not a procedure.

The problem.

Telemetry contracts leak. Once the logs are at the vendor, the perimeter is fiction.

The principle.

Observability that ships with the runtime.

A fully integrated LGTM stack inside the sovereign boundary. Instrumentation via Beyla and eBPF, so RED metrics emit without code changes. No third-party telemetry contracts. No data crossing the perimeter.

The problem.

BAAs are usually negotiated. The architecture is asked to live up to the document. We do it the other way around.

The principle.

The BAA is a description of how the runtime already behaves.

Every deployment writes to an append-only audit log. Every configuration is signed. Every region change is recorded. Compliance evidence emerges from the runtime, not from a separate process you run before the auditor arrives.